Lindsay Lohan Hates Money, Won't Pose Nude for Playboy

So you wanna see Lindsay Lohan's lung balloons again, do ya? Well, sorry buddy, but you're plum outta luck. Apparently lesbianism has made LiLo less of an exhibitionist. What a gyp. According to Page Six:

IT'S once nude, twice shy for Lindsay Lohan. The Sapphic-leaning star has turned down a $700,000 offer to do an eight-page topless spread in Playboy's 55th-anniversary issue this January. "If there's nudity, then the answer's no . . . She's not going down the [New York] magazine road again," Lohan's rep told Playboy's creative consultant, Hal Lifson, referring to Lindsay's naked Marilyn Monroe tribute last winter. Lifson said he hoped to have Lohan do a tribute to '60s sex kitten Ann-Margret and her film "Kitten With a Whip," which is one of Lohan's faves.

So let's get this straight: Lindsay, who once was worth a "poor" and "disgusting" seven million dollars and has went through multiple pricey rehab stints since then without raking in much more cash through a little thing called "work", was willing to show off pretty much everything but her pee hole for free in New York magazine but won't repeat the effort for Playboy for $700,000? Is she so ashamed of her former red-headed, freckled self that she's unwilling to recapture the look in tribute to Ann-Margret? Or is she just relying on little sis Ali paying the bills from now on? Cause that doesn't seem like a very solid plan.


At least you can see Lindsay Lohan get sexy at MrSkin.com.

Related posts:

Tagged as: celebrity nudity, celebs posing for Playboy, Lindsay Lohan, magazines